My algo has a 1.70 Sharpe after 84 days live — but 0 copiers. Sharing the full equity curve so someone can tell me what I'm doing wrong

I've been quietly operating a spot algo on Binance since early March — real cash, no paper trading — and after 84 days I'm making an attempt to know why I've zero copiers regardless of metrics that I assumed would stand out. Posting the complete screenshot because I genuinely want suggestions, not validation.

The technique is a dynamic ATR grid with a circuit breaker that mechanically halts new purchase orders throughout sharp drops to protect capital. Hosted on AWS Tokyo for latency reasons.

90-day reside outcomes:
– ROI: +16.39% (PnL: +$84.83)
– Sharpe Ratio: 1.70
– Max Drawdown: 13.11%
– Win Price: 79.52% — 66 of 84 days inexperienced

The factor I find most fascinating in that equity curve is the March–April period. You'll be able to see the drawdown line spike when the market dropped, then the bot paused buys, and it recovered to new highs by late Might without any guide intervention. The circuit breaker did exactly what it was designed to do.

For context: a Sharpe of 1.zero is extensively thought-about "good" for an lively strategy. Most retail algo merchants I see posting listed here are proud of 0.7–zero.9 on backtests. This is 1.70 on a stay account with actual slippage and costs.

And yet — Binance's copy buying and selling algorithm buries me as a result of my lead stability is ~$618. Merchants with $50okay–$100okay and visibly worse drawdowns are featured above me.

Two issues I'm genuinely not sure about:
1. Is there a option to make risk-adjusted metrics extra seen to potential copiers on platforms like this, or is it purely a capital signaling recreation?
2. Taking a look at my fairness curve — is there anything that might make you personally hesitant to copy this, that I'm not seeing from the inside?

Recognize trustworthy takes.